By Mitchell
It seems somewhat pretentious to write an obit on someone as great as Ingmar Bergman, who died today at 89. Writing a piece like that is travelling on a slippery slope - you start discussing the man and his films, and the next thing you know you're offering deep, meaningful interpretations, discussing autobiographical and existential overtones, and sounding like every pompous college graduate you've ever known, dressed in a black turtleneck and tweed jacket and offering incredibly erudite opinions on film theory, all the while burying the knowledge that in reality your opinion is no better, no worse than anyone else's.That he was great isn't something that really should be in dispute, although the word pretentious was often used with regard to his films as well. And they were often dark, challenging stories that operated on multiple layers, using symbolism and language to convey the innermost aspects of the human condition. (There, see how easy it is to slip into that mode?) Bergman was not to everyone's taste, but then neither is Jack Black.
So we're not going to attempt to explain Bergman here. Bergman himself did it about as well as anyone could, in a 1971 interview with Dick Cavett, in which he talks about his youth and gives candid appraisals of his films (and, at one point abruptly shifts gears and starts interviewing Cavett).
Rather, take this as an opportunity to go out and watch a Bergman film and find out what all the shouting was about. The Seventh Seal is a personal favorite, and you're likely to find it either incredibly brilliant or amazingly self-indulgent (or, perhaps, both). A warning, though: if you're contemplating suicide anytime soon, best to stay away from The Silence or Cries and Whispers; better, instead, to go with The Magic Flute or Smiles of a Summer Night, which showed that Bergman did have a lighter side. (Even he admitted many of his dark movies were too much for him to take.) Rent them on Netflix, or check Turner Classic Movies for the inevitable film tribute that should be coming shortly.
Love him or hate him, there's no doubting that Bergman was a giant, a master of what one piece referred to as "serious filmmaking." It's a quality that's in short supply today, as movies pander to adolescents real or imagined, always looking for the next smash 'em up, blow 'em up blockbuster. While Bergman was making films, we could always be assured that there would be something out there that offered us a chance to think, to reflect, to discuss in the coffeehouse after the theatre had gone dark.
And when the giants like Bergman go, it gives us an opportunity to reflect, to realize once again that while the screens and the theatres may be larger, the movies are much, much smaller.
Mitchell: I have nothing to add to this great post. You are right, what CAN on say about Bergman?
ReplyDeleteThough, you did bring up the name of another interviewer I miss: Dick Cavett!
Funny that Cavett would indirectly come up in both posts today, isn't it?
ReplyDeleteI know Bergman's not for everyone (Terry Teachout, for example, but I still like him!), but he certainly strikes a chord in me. I think I'll need to get out "The Seventh Seal" this weekend, preferably late at night, which is when Bergman plays best.
And who plays the role of Bergman today? I didn't discuss that in the piece, but I wonder if you'd nominate Wim Wenders?
Mitchell
Mitchell: I don't know that I'd nominate Wenders. Certainly, Allen thinks he's the new Bergman. He's been telling us so for decades.
ReplyDeleteWenders is still active but my favorite Bergman influenced director is Krzysztof Kieslowski who is, unfortunately, deceased.
I heard this morning that Michelangelo Antonioni died.
Really? I hadn't heard about Antonioni. They're dropping like flies, aren't they? I admit I'm not as familiar with him as I should be, but I recall a documentary Scorsese did on Italian cinema a few years ago, and became intrigued with it for the first time. I suppose I should be more interested in Fellini as well, although Judie saw quite a few of his films back in the day.
ReplyDeleteI have to admit Wenders is a director I like more due to reputation than his actual work. Perhaps you'd compare him more to David Lynch than Bergman? And we haven't even started to get into Truffaut yet. (Eever seen "Shoot the Piano Player"?)
No, I have not. But Malle is probably my favorite French director. There are some comparisons between Lynch and Wenders. How about John Waters and Pedro Almadovar?
ReplyDeleteMaybe you should have a film roundtable on Our Word?
This whole dialogue just reiterates to me the fact that most of the films at the local multiplex are eminently forgettable.
We'll be more than happy to host it, if you would be one of the participants! Plus, we'll need you to shill for it on your site, since I think your readership is larger than ours...
ReplyDeleteMitchell
Ha! That would be fun. Count me in. I may not bring any intelligence to the dialog so you've been warned.
ReplyDeleteAfter my last vaca, my blog readership is down. Plus, I'm working on a really long post that is taking more of my time then I thought. Of course, I think blog readership is down all over with vacations and all going on for the summer.