That was an automatic red light district. That is not possible -- a woman cannot take a wife (only a man can). Citing Sections 20-1-10 ("No woman shall marry . . . another woman.") and 20-1-15 ("A marriage between two persons of the same sex is null and void ab initio."), I knew this wasn't real. This was offensive to anyone, especially the seventy-eight percent in this state that made their vote heard in 2006. To take from Leviticus 18:22, "(A man) shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." In this case, a woman shall not like with womankind, as with mankind. As Romans 1:27 noted, these two women left the natural use of the man, burned in their lust one towards another, and women with women working that was unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Thankfully someone had a seat in another section that his daughter was to use but she had been given a ticket to move up to the best sections, and I took that seat in a lower section. I was pleased that I took the seat, since these people need to learn they are offending The Seventy-Eight Percent with their actions. Why is it these crybabies get to dictate their mandate to everyone else?