The media gets it wrong AGAIN!

A University of Michigan music professor and his alleged love interest (a relationship that is a SIN per Leviticus 18:22 and Romans 1) were arrested for sexual assault.  But what heavily offended us was how that lover was listed as his "husband" when men cannot have husbands, they can only have wives.  Both men were busted for sexual assault.  And this sin was sin, and as thinking of a vintage television show, it's Truth or Consequences, he exchanged the truth and the consequences is arrest.

Please, AP, it is NOT the man's "husband".  The other man just a perverted live-in lover.

Read these Bible verses to confirm what he did was sin.

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." -- Leviticus 18:22

"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them."-- Romans 1:18-32

Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander: incident at the Renée Fleming recital

The recent recital at the Peace Center in Greenville featuring Renée Fleming that I attended (also scratched her name from the "best singer I've yet to see" list since I have now seen her;  that honour goes to Анна Нетребко) also caused a microaggression by the Left after I entered my seat that cost only one Andrew Jackson (a twenty dollar ticket is still better than a sixty dollar ticket that's 150 feet away for a mega-pop star).  In time, you must show the Left a taste of their own medicine.  As I introduced myself to a few people around our seating area before the event, the young woman next to me introduced a second woman as "my wife".

That was an automatic red light district.  That is not possible -- a woman cannot take a wife (only a man can).  Citing Sections 20-1-10 ("No woman shall marry . . . another woman.") and 20-1-15 ("A marriage between two persons of the same sex is null and void ab initio."), I knew this wasn't real.  This was offensive to anyone, especially the seventy-eight percent in this state that made their vote heard in 2006.  To take from Leviticus 18:22, "(A man) shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."  In this case, a woman shall not like with womankind, as with mankind.  As Romans 1:27 noted, these two women left the natural use of the man, burned in their lust one towards another, and women with women working that was unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Thankfully someone had a seat in another section that his daughter was to use but she had been given a ticket to move up to the best sections, and I took that seat in a lower section.  I was pleased that I took the seat, since these people need to learn they are offending The Seventy-Eight Percent with their actions.  Why is it these crybabies get to dictate their mandate to everyone else?

On the coming persecution (iii)

From Francis Poulenc's famous opera Dialogues of the Carmelites:

Sister Constance: "Are there no men left to come to the aid of the country?"

Mother Superior: "When priests are lacking, martyrs are superabundant."

The new CCCP

From Title 28, United States Code, Section 455, sections (a) and (b):

(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:
   (1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;
   (2) Where in private practice he served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it;
   (3) Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy;
   (4) He knows that he, individually or as a fiduciary, or his spouse or minor child residing in his household, has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;
   (5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
     (i) Is a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party;
     (ii) Is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;
     (iii) Is known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;
     (iv) Is to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.

By rule, sections (a) and (b) automatically disqualified Ginsberg and Kagan.  But at seven justices, a fair hearing would have been made.

The NFL prohibited a game official from working games where his son (now retired) participated.  On the same, note, an umpire would not be allowed to officiate his child's games.  And a parent's business partner isn't allowed to officiate that child's games either.  NASCAR barred Jeff Gordon from serving on the rookie panel in 2002 (a custom that the reigning champion serves on the rookie panel) because he had an interest in a rookie contender.  A similar rule would be in play of a Hendrick Motorsports Holden driver, or Kevin Harvick, wins the championship because Chase Elliott is a Hendrick driver (and Mr. Harvick has been an Xfinity teammate to Mr. Elliott on Dale Earnhardt Jr's team).

All of those situations are similar to the said regulations regarding judges that demanded a judicial disqualification of Sotomayor and Ginsberg.  Both judges publicly demanded marriage redefinition, one as the President's attorney (Solicitor General) and one publicly presided over a few illegal weddings.  That is grounds for disqualification.  The case redefining marriage should be overturned on this technicality.

But it never matters to the Left's arrogance.  They overturned thirty states and pushed urban values of the New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, and college towns on the rest of America.  The Founding Fathers knew the dangers of allowing large states to have total control over smaller states, resulting in the Great Compromise on the legislative front, overturned on the state level in 1964.  Note the South's protests against taxation by Calhoun and others that led to attempts at nullification, and the Civil War (which is now the target of a deconfederatisation push similar to 1946 Germany in the wake of Mother Emanuel, which was caused by a rogue nihilist).  Anthony Kennedy was a "Plan C" judge that Ronald Reagan did not nominate as much as Joseph Biden, Ted Kennedy, and Robert Byrd made the selection, since Senate leaders on the Judiciary Committee and the Majority Leader handily shot down President Reagan's choice for the seat, Robert Bork, with the most lopsided defeat in history.   A second judge withdrew over what we call today a violation of WADA standards, effectively giving the choice to liberal leaders.  The Obama, Biden, and Clinton judges together caused this mess that we are paying today with the loss of our freedoms and replacement of it by the new one of Sexual Freedom.

Antonin Scalia proved best stating, "The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie."  When majorities of over 60% nationally, and 75% in many states (Mississippi over 86%) are crushed by the judicial dictatorship overturning their Constitutions to push the outcome the Left demands, we have a totalitarian regime.

This is the Outcome-Based Education issue of the 1990's again.  Remember the controversy over "invented spelling"?  Whatever you feel is right is the only thing that counts.  And this was "invented lawmaking" -- whatever you feel is right again is the only thing that matters.  No standards matter.

We are headed to a dictatorship of a humanist theocracy with the judges.   Mao's Cultural Revolution is rapidly approaching.  With the deconfederatisation movement at full steam, we are headed to the abolition of all Confederate figures and history (including the CSS Hunley that preceded the German U-boats by 50 years, along with the CSS Virginia vs USS Monitor battles, which revolutionised war globally as the first ironclad ship battle), Memorial Day (celebration Union War dead in 1867) and even the Calgary Flames (named for the burning of its original city in the war), and its replacement by sexual deviancy hero Harvey Milk, with his birthday becoming a federal holiday to celebrate what a majority opposes -- that's a dictatorship.  We're also headed to persecution of Christians.

Christians taking a stand doesn't matter to them.  Liberals want a de facto dictatorship, and sexual freedom allows it to create a new caste system where Christians are the untouchables, and an apartheid system that separates deviants, atheists, and elites supporting them into a "privileged" class and Christians, along with those that hold a Biblical worldview, as the "punished" class.  This is not what the Founding Fathers envisioned.  Welcome to the new CCCP.

Abusive courts attack Declaration of Independence

When the United States Supreme Court overturned Constitutions declaring marriage as One Man and One Woman to force five states into the evil agenda of the humanists, the Founding Fathers could be easily angered by the actions of these rogues that, in 11 years, have imposed their ideology on half of the nation (and potentially more) through their whim.

In our fourth grade history books, we had to quote most of the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence.  One specific section holds true with these cases.

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security."

These activist judges overturning Constitutions have effectively become a tyrant.  When the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ordered marriage redefined in 2003, other states struck back and imposed a check on these rogue judges.  Now, the judges are overturning the checks placed on these judges, effectively making them tyrants.  These actions are reminiscent of six grievances listed by the Founding Fathers in the Declaration of Independence:

(1) Obstructing the administration of justices (see the numerous Autogol strategies, where the administration of justice is obstructed by a whim).

(2) Judges dependent on the leader's will. (See court packing to advance the agenda.)

(3) Establishing new government offices (such as "human rights" panels used to enforce homosexual activism).

(4) Trial for pretended offenses (see hate crimes or supporting the Bible, not the state).

(5) Abolishing the free system of laws to make it an arbitrary government (in most cases, same-sex "marriage" is a byproduct of judicial mandates, or large cities using abuses that were developed by courts in Reynolds v. Sims to overturn the Great Compromise;  furthermore, when abolishing the Constitution to develop something they want themselves, that was abuse the Founding Fathers warned against).

(6) Taking away the charters, abolishing valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments (see the courts overturning Constitutions; the check on the judges has been overturned by the judges themselves -- our checks and balances system was designed to protect against rogue judges, so they strike back).

Ponder these points from our Founding Fathers when you consider the rogue activism today.

Autogol

I danced for five years at a major dance studio in the region, and we competed annually. I do not think our choreographer wanted us to sabotage our routines, and cause us to lose to opponents. I played varsity baseball while a 6th grader for a small parochial school, and while we never won, I don't think Coaches Frazier and Griffin wanted us to throw games. We worked on fundamentals. I've debated, and would never consider doing ANYTHING to intentionally cause our team to lose.

Anyone who has played sports and is on defense knows the goal is to prevent the offense from scoring. The sad thing from overturning both Proposition 8 and the Defence of Marriage Act is that the Supreme Court ruled the defendants' attorneys were not entitled to defend the statutes in question. In the former, it was a private party, and in the latter, it was the Leader of the Loyal Opposition. In both cases, the attorneys entitled to defend the statutes were on the opposition, the respective Attorneys General (Kamala Harris in California and Eric Holder for the United States) were not defending the laws they were supposed to defend, but chose to side with the sexual deviancy lobby.

In effect, the Attorneys General told their teams to work against what they were supposed to defend. It would be a head coach telling his players to score own goals in an attempt to lose games. It is akin to being one of the members of the Black Sox, and Kennesaw Mountain Landis could not prosecute them.

That is the larger issue with overturning both DOMA and Proposition 8. The courts have said if an attorney jumps ship and sides with the opponent, the defence cannot hire a new attorney to defend them. Is that the court of law?

The only thing I can say about what both cases did is something you hear at football broadcasts but you do not want to happen.

¡¡¡¡¡AUTOGOL!!!!!

If you were a defender, and you scored an own goal, you would be ashamed of yourself. But in the overturning of both cases, the Mr. Holder and Mrs. Harris patted themselves on the back, since they worked against the side they were supposed to defend, and instead worked to score the own goal.

Sad. The real problem now is the Supreme Court ruled the attorney who is supposed to defend can now jump ship and cause an instant victory for the opposing side. ◙

The risk of sexual deviants: Prop 8 and Defence of Marriage Act

Is there a possibility, that the government of nations may fall into the hands of men, who teach the most disconsolate of all creeds, that men are but fire-flies, and that this all is without a father? Is this the way, to make man, as man, an object of respect? Or is it, to make murder itself, as indifferent as shooting a plover, and the extermination of the Rohilla nation, as innocent, as the swallowing of mites, on a morsel of cheese?" -- John Adams, the Second President of the United States.

The cases launched by sexual deviancy activists against Proposition 8 and the Defence of Marriage Act, both of which have the Obama Administration supporting the activists, have resulted in a Supreme Court hearing starting this week.

What happens in the courts regarding marriage will determine a long way into the future of this very Republic, whether we are to stay a nation under God, or we shall become the nation of France during the Reign of Terror, of which a future President of the United States references, including the dastardly deeds of the time. It was a time of religious persecution, a state-run humanist agenda, where the weeks were ten days each, and there was no Sabbath or religious holidays.

The sexual deviancy movement that is leading the push to redefine marriage have a humanist worldview, and they want to abolish the church from helping the needy (see Catholic Charities) and make the government the source of everything, as we saw liberals push in the Life of Julia series in their successful re-election with the Low Information Voter.

In Minnesota, Grace Evans, 11, asked the following question to those attempting to redefine marriage to appease sexual deviants:

Since every child needs a mom and a dad to be born, I don’t think we can change that children need a mom and a dad. I believe God made it that way. I know some disagree, but I want to ask you this question: Which parent do I not need – my mom or my dad?

The legislators were stumped. Nevertheless, the DFL decided to attempt redefinition to appease the activists. Her father Jeff noted something more serious about the debate:

Supporters of [the sexual deviants' agenda) are deceitfully claiming that the (redefinition of marriage to any two] won’t affect our religious freedoms or freedom of speech. I do not believe them. These attacks on Grace are an example of how we have already lost many of these freedoms. In fact, it’s so bad, they aren’t afraid to viciously attack an 11-year-old girl.

Taking away the rights of churches to run foster care, adoption, and at-risk youth ministries (such as Connie Maxwell, Epworth, and others; this is proven in states with such arrogance), along with government closures of soup kitchens run by churches, all in the name of preaching “hate” and pushing a worldview that is not that of the deviancy activists, and converting the church into social clubs where the Gospel cannot be taught, or even closing the church for “hate” speech, all of which are part of the key doctrines of the Obama Administration, the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jnr Memorial Hate Crimes Act (passed in the National Defence Authorisation Act of Fiscal Year 2010), and even Public Law 111-321 (the law that redefines the military to becoming a homosexual indoctrination force). The elimination of churches and their ministries listed above, establishing state-run humanism as the official state religion in violation of the First Amendment, and turning houses of worship into other types of buildings (as shown in the Bolshevik Revolution) is the ultimate goal of homosexual "marriage" activists attempting to ram their agenda down our throats.

We've seen the homosexual agenda's push for “sexual orientation protection” turn into the Pennsylvania State University child sex molestation scandal, as the child sex molester used the “sexual orientation” protection status at the school to protect Jerry Sandusky at the expense of children. This dangerous policy is now at schools and corporations in this state even, the fear is if the homosexual agenda pushes even further, children will be sacrificed at the altar of homosexual activists, protected by such policies that the President endorses. Not even schools will be safe from child molesters, protected by the activists.

John Adams was right. Activists want to create a humanist utopia, and a low information generation is working to push it. It's the sexual deviancy activists that are bullies, working the hardest to force a humanist theocracy on us, where the laws of God are thrown out and replaced with the wants of a tiny but vocal minority that pushes sin in violation of Leviticus 19 and Romans 1.

The entire nation is at risk. Are we headed to France of the Robspierre Reign of Terror, where there is an extremist humanist force in our courts and government, that will rule with an iron fist and eliminate the Freedom of Religion our Founding Fathers gave us, all in the name of appeasing the sexual deviancy activists? Are we headed to the Communism that Rep. Albert Herlong (D-FL) envisioned 50 years ago? Are we headed to the Humanist Theocracy run by a tiny, but vocal, minority of sexual deviancy activists that indoctrinate a generation into their worldview, reminiscent of Charpentier's Louise, where the titular character represented the nation, her parents represented the values of the America we and our Founding Fathers know, backed by God's Holy Word, and Julien and the Bohemians represent the sexual deviancy and humanists' lobby in an attempt to turn her to the dark side (the postmodern humanist agenda). We must not bow down to the sexual deviancy activists to ths.eir utopia where the church disappears, and we are living in Robspierre's Reign of Terror, where religious freedom is sacrificed at the altar of appeasing the sexual deviants' agenda, and debate is replaced by forced indoctrination of the humanist agenda that includes the ten-day week without Sabbath or religious holidays, and the utopia of homosexual activists, including protecting child molesters at the expense of the children. ◙

The ulterior motives of secular humanists

As the national March for Marriage comes this weekend, we must remind ourselves of the fight against a pro-sin movement calling themselves “for marriage equality”. The ulterior motive of the sexual deviancy activists with their “freedom to marry,” or “marriage equality” movement, which is to redefine marriage to mean “any two, regardless of sex,” continues the postmodern liberal humanist agenda to end Freedom of Religion by continuously eroding the rights of the church to help those in need, and to give control exclusively to the government of more situations the church had participated.

In states where marriage has been redefined or a dangerous “civil union” has been developed, churches have been banned from offering adoption, foster care, or any number of services that only the government or government-approved secular agencies can offer, mainly in order to indoctrinate them into the liberal teachings, or to allow a child to have two parents of the same gender, an attempt to force-feed them into the postmodern humanist agenda.

If this is forced down on other states, as endorsed by Dear Leader, churches will be converted into toothless social clubs where the Bible cannot be taught with sound doctrine and theology under threats of Shepard-Byrd and the government has barred them from running soup kitchens, foster care, or adoption agencies because of their refusal to comply with the humanist agenda, the “military” will ban chaplains, and freedom of religion will be replaced by the wants of a few sexual deviant activists where their coercion is mandated. We've seen most of it in states where it has happened. It's another way to expand government by eliminating churches' God-given plan to help those in need, and to replace it with government authority because the church refuses to comply with an edict to normalise sin.

Much to the thought of a pop tune (yes, this was before the LaRoche Era), “The newest rage is to reason it out, just meditate and you can overcome any doubt, After all, man is a god and God is no longer alive,” that is the mentality of today's humanists that want to use the homosexual agenda to drive the church off the public square. (1) Man versus God is now the battle, and a generation infused with false teachings is trying to turn the tide against churches. They want the courts to establish humanism as the state religion, and any religion that preaches the Bible will become a crime.

(1)“The Basics of Life,” Mark Harris and Donald Koch. Copyright 1990 Universal Music Publishing. ◙

Eat Mor Chikin

Some photos from an 8 PM visit to Chick-fil-A on National Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day. Our local store is just off Interstate 26 (Exit 145A) and opening in April 2011.

Keep the date...

The dangers of Obama's sell-out to sexual deviants

Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. (KJV)" -- Leviticus 18:22

If it isn't clear the President is now siding with sexual deviants' and their right to change marriage in order to advance their agenda that has successfully seen new speech codes, the DSE/SRD, new benefits for homosexual couples, and sexual predators being protected, the report in The Washington BLEEP proved at a clip of one out of six major-dollar donors are sexual deviants, all of whom want to violate the aforementioned verse in the Bible.

The sexual deviancy lobby's playbook has been exposed for years. Rep. Herlong nearly 50 years ago noted the Communist Goals included normalising the deviant behaviour. They aren't playing by the rules; they want dictatorships that rewrite the rules to favour them, and punish everyone else. Our fundamental freedoms do not matter to them; they want a dictatorship, a New World Order, where they are the superior class and everyone else must bow to them.

Shepard-Byrd, rammed down using the defence authorisation act tactics in 2009, was an example of the loss of freedom of speech and religion. Any speech that a sexual deviant declares hateful (mainly caused by it being from the Bible) can now be reported as hate speech and the speaker be charged with a federal hate crime, effectively making "equal justice under the law" changed to "arbitrary justice based on" various special groups based on race, religion, or "sexual orientation" of criminals and victims, as Sen. DeMint referenced. As we've seen in other nations, it has been used on the Bible. Swedish minister Åke Green was prosecuted for preaching sexual deviancy was a sin in violation of the aforementioned verse. Alberta minister Stephen Boissoin was prosecuted for saying the truth about the sexual deviancy activists' agenda. Churches were punished in 1954 by then-Representative Lyndon B. Johnson, who used laws to block churches from discussing national issues in order to punish his opponents. With 2009's Shepard-Byrd, it's open season.
The second major point of the sexual deviants' agenda that the President has endorsed is to curtail the church itself. For many years, churches have run foster care and adoption agencies, and established homes for at-risk youth that develop these children into positive role models. We saw in states where false "marriage" was legalised that churches have lost the right to establish such agencies, and the government has total control. In the past, the church helped those in need, and liberals want it to be the government. What can the church do if the government states because they do not believe in the values of the state (which is the sexual deviants' agenda), they must shut down their ministries and their teachings are criminal under federal hate crime statues?

Opinions and more

Religious Persecution.  Here we go again. Another round of liberal legislators ramming down “redefinition of marriage” laws to eliminate “man and woman” and “husband and wife,” and replacing them with “Spouse A” and “Spouse B”. A group of religious leaders noted marriage counselors cannot be accredited without recognising these false “relationships,” and special benefits for properly married employees must also be given to sexual deviants. Furthermore, there have been cases where people were fired for violations of moral character when an employer fired an employee for having an illegal marriage that, in South Carolina, violate Sections 20-1-10, 20-1-15 of state law and Article XVII, Section 15 of the state constitution. Churches cannot block their venues from sexual deviant activists who want to hold their ceremonies, and churches cannot sponsor adoption agencies because of their Biblical teachings violate the humanism as the state religion standard.  Various ministers speak out here.  Here are comments from the Archdiocese of New York.

So let me see here. We have schools promoting holidays for Harvey Milk, César Chávez, Vladimir I. Lenin, and other figures of the Left (if you don't be careful, we'll see a birthday celebration for this esteemed Thug in Chief before long), but guess whose birthday is not even observed in schools this weekend, as should be the case? That's right, George Washington, the father of the country. Have we fallen to this low of a standard?

Dress Properly! Controversy at CPAC erupted over a Hotair video when a reporter (Tina Korbe) was found wearing a skirt extremely short that she was shown pulling it down during an interview. When being at an event, please dress professionally!

Debra Saunders on Occupy Oakland's stupidity. ◙

Trouble for Christian charities with more false marriage

Our little parochial school's baseball and softball teams played games on a field at a denomination-run orphanage, what is now the local chapter of the Connie Maxwell Children's Home, named for the daughter of a Greenwood family who bequeathed the original home in memory of their seven-year old daughter, a victim of scarlet fever in the 1880's).

This story reminds me of the dangerous consequences of Friday night's dastardly passage of a “redefinition of marriage” in New York that changes marriage to the “any two” where it's no longer “I Now Pronounce You Husband and Wife” to “I Now Pronounce You Spouses” as new marriage certificate applications will now state specifically “Spouse A” and “Spouse B”. “Husband” and “Wife”, “Bride” and “Groom”, and “Man” and “Woman” are now banned, replaced by the A/B designation as art of the new “definition of marriage” to advance the Gill Agenda.

As the advancement of the Gill Agenda has now come, in the words of Albert Mohler, has come to the point one out of every nine Americans are now in states where false “marriage” is legalised, the Catholic and Protestant charities such as Catholic Charities, Connie Maxwell Children's Home, and other faith-based charities such as Mercy Ministries are now being punished where Christians are no longer permitted to run their own adoption agencies, foster homes, or help the weakest because their reliance on the Bible violates new standards of “the family” as defined in “civil union” and new “definition of marriage” laws passed in the past decade. Massachusetts, Illinois, Iowa, District of Columbia, and now New York are among areas where Catholic Charities and Protestant organisations the equivalent of Connie Maxwell are now banned from their work of adoption because they only allow adoptions to heterosexual married couples, and ban unmarried couples (“shacking up”) and same-sex “couples” from adoptions, which violate the New World Order that gives sexual deviants special rights, something Public Laws 111-84 and 111-321 have rewarded.

Freedom of Religion, long a basic freedom of this nation, is rapidly in the past fifty years of humanism being eroded. False marriage laws ban churches and religious organisations from doing the charity work of the past. With the one out of nine standard, churches are no longer being permitted to organise their charities as state and federal authorities impose new standards based on the requests of sexual deviants over all others that conflict with Biblical teachings. Churches are now being forced to exit as freedom of religion is replaced by the rights of deviants. No wonder pop culture, sexual deviants in Hollywood, the teachings of modern textbooks, and other pieces of the indoctrination has given us a world where the church is now replaced by the government, and sexual deviants are superior to Christians where they can impose their standards on everyone, while Christians are not even allowed participation in the square. ◙

Luck o' the digest

Sure and it's time for a look at the digest:

Guy Benson: John Conyers calls ObamaCare a “platform” for foreign-style “single payer” socialised medicine.

Jonah Goldberg: Talk About a Meltdown.

Peter Ferrara: Slouching Towards Argentina.

Karen Crouse: Feel locked out? Can't find work? Try Opera.

Roger Kaplan: Obama, Sarkozy, Qaddafi: What is democracy if you cannot have big public debates?

Janice Shaw Crouse: Marriage doesn't count; Feds tabulate same-sex behaviour. (an attempt to push for the sexual deviants' agenda to be pushed) ◙

Opinion Digest

Opinions worth reading:

Brannon Howse: Glenn Beck's New Book Reveals He Embraces New Age Theology, Is a Knowledgeable Mormon, and a Universalist.

WorldNetDaily: Rick Warren hosts “cult” celebrity doctors. (The kingpin of Life Enhancement Centres promotes Eastern mysticism.)

In light of attending Rick Santorum's speech Saturday at the South Carolina March for Life regarding one of his children, and the attempt by the doctors to kill her using “hospice” and excessive morphine, Chuck Norris' two columns on ObamaCare's Baby Death Panels.

Star Parker: Restoring a Culture of Life.

Michelle Malkin: Blame Righty: A Condensed History.

Dennis Prager: Libeling the Right.

Ingrid Schlueter: El Paso (TX) City Officials ignore voters and force Homosexual "Domestic Partner" Benefits. ◙

Opinion Digest

Some information out of the pipelines we've read this week.

Rich Lowry: The World According to Judge Walker.

Jonah Goldberg: The United States of Arabia Has Arrived.

Albert Mohler: A Gavel Falls on Marriage: The Proposition Eight Decision.

Phyllis Schlafly: Un-American “American History” Courses.

Bill Connor: A Return to Biblical Worldview.

Fred Dardick: If Humans are Responsible for Global Warming, How Come No One Can Tell Me Why?

Glenn Beck: Boy Scouts Boo Obama.  ◙

More stupidity

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
- from the Declaration of Independence

Another absurd ruling by Judge Vaughan Walker, an admitted sexual deviant, who believes his feelings and foreign laws are superior to the laws passed by the people by the defeat of Proposition 8.

Sen. DeMint (who is this author's Senator) noted in a statement, “(W)e cannot simply toss (marriage) aside to fit the political whims of liberal activists with gavels. Marriage is a religious institution that was codified into law to protect it. Now, the courts are trying to deprive the majority of Americans who value marriage the democratic ability to protect it any longer. If our marriage laws are valueless, they will become meaningless.”

California voters passed Proposition 22 that declared “marriage is a between one man and one woman” in 2000. In 2008, an activist judge ruled it unconstitutional, and mandated the legalisation of false marriage, resulting in a Constitutional Amendment to secure the rule of one man and one woman (Proposition 8), which passed. Now a judge has decided this is illegal, and this time, the laws and constitutional amendments of a majority of states are being overturned on the feelings of one activist judge. This decision was cheered by both Senators of the state in question and the de facto Prime Minister of the nation (Speaker Pelosi) who, not the President (GW Bush), ran the nation from 2007-09 by passing legislation that created this mess in the totalitarian style of the Left, which together cheered the decision (in fact, her press secretary, a homosexual male, “married” his partner in Washington DC, where false marriage is recognised) to force marriage to be redefined to what is used in Argentina, Canada, Sweden, Netherlands, South Africa, Belgium, and other “progressive” nations. The danger here is the more nations approve such false “marriage,” the more we'll see the Supreme Court justices who believe the nation's legislative capital is in Bruxelles use those nations' laws to overturn state amendments passed by the people (which is how Massachusetts started this mess in the first place by declaring foreign law superior).

The approval of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court (who told law school students to not study United States law, but mandated study of foreign law, and wanted the military off campus in order to protest against her feelings), and the declaration of Proposition 8 as unconstitutional both fit the long train of abuses by leaders to reduce the people to Despotism. ◙

Abuse of freedom

Last year, I referenced Orwellian doublespeak (from 1984) and in light of recent discussions and campaign strategies, I learned even the word “Freedom” has now become the subject of Orwellian doublespeak. As such, federal laws and liberal bill ideas fit the ideology of the use of “freedom” in an abusive matter.

Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act. This law gives abortion clinics special protection churches, houses, and other places cannot receive – a federal law protecting them from anything.

Freedom of Choice Act. This bill (which is endorsed by House and Senate leaders, along with the President) would invalidate all laws against infanticide and open murder of children to all nine months plus. The worst part is it is an abuse of the term “freedom” in that it allows baby murder at all times.

Freedom to Marry. Used by liberal activists to promote sexual deviancy (same-sex “marriage”) by court orders and liberal legislatures, it is an abuse of the term to mandate their demands. New Hampshire governor John Lynch is running for a fourth two-year term and is using “freedom of choice” and “freedom to marry” as his accomplishments. It actually is a sell-out to the Gill Agenda, and now we have a potential Supreme Court justice who, as Solicitor General, is sold out to this agenda that she will betray federal (Defence of Marriage Act) law in order to push their own leftist agenda.

Have we allowed the Left to abuse terms to appease their own special organisations? ◙

The Stupidity of the Gill Agenda

By Bobby Chang

The Tim Gill Agenda has just struck again in California. This time, Sony Pictures Television's The Newlywed Game 2009 (GSN, Carnie Wilson) will feature as a celebrity in a celebrity episode of the Chuck Barris classic (Sony owns the Barris library) a homosexual "married couple," as was permitted in California between May 2008 (when a court in California legalised it per request of Gavin "Any Twosom" Newsom, as referenced by radio talk show host Michael Weiner, Ph. D) and November 2008 (when it was banned by Proposition 8). What in the world have we come when this type of stupidity is allowed? It is more suitable for MTV's homosexual network than a game show.

Add that to proposals to push the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (a bill that the late Sen. Kennedy first proposed, and would likely now be called Kennedy Memorial), which would allow child molesters free reign in schools, and force churches and other organisations to hire child molesters, regardless of their hazards, or face litigation that favours the molester, the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act that would force the other states to recognise the false "marriages" pushed by the Gill Agenda (and the courts) -- this repeal has been silently endorsed by the Obama Administration, and Congressional rewriting of standards that would allow homosexual "couples" to be treated as if they were married for Washington employees, we are seeing the stupidity of this agenda. The next push may be to put same-sex "couples" as "married" for purposes of taxes and the socialised medicine agenda, since it's clear that sexual deviants have diseases related to their lifestyle that cannot be punished under proposed standards. Now that they've found ways to push through judges that rewrite marriage, and bully other legislators to follow the Spanish model, the scare is we have legislators on the Left fully built on creating a new country built on their standards that violate Leviticus 20:13, I Corinthians 6:9, and other verses in the Bible. In fact, these activists would love to see this country destroyed in the way Sodom was in Genesis 19.

Here we go again with stupidity.

More Gill Money: More False Marriage

By Bobby

Ah, yes.

Tim Gill's money trail is at it again. New Hampshire has now fallen to the Gill Project's false-marriage ideals with the passage of a bill that legalises the false "marriage" ideals of San Francisco's "Any Two-Some Newsom," as Dr. Weiner says. And once again, an investigation turned up the homosexual activist's cash in the hands of the ruling liberals in the Granite State. While the New Hampshire Motor Speedway is all about "Live Free and Race," the homosexual activists have a "Don't Let Anyone Live Free, Let's Put Our Facist Policies In" ideal. "If you're pro-family and support the Bible, you must die. You have no right to live" is the philosophy of the state leadership, bought and paid for by the homosexual activist Mr. Gill.

And it's a plan that he worked in many states, and now has more in his sights. I found he had contributed to a lesbian candidate in Charleston who lost, and nearly claimed the Congressional seat thanks to that cash. That candidate was an heiress to the empire that built a North Carolina supermarket that is now Belgian, and remember, Belgium is a country that accepts the false marriage.

Please, it's time we stop this push to false marriage. Can anyone stop this dangerous train?

Sources:
Star Tribune
Citizen Link